4 Comments

The Great Gatsby

It’s colorful, it’s dynamic, it’s vibrant…it’s just not very good. Not sure what I expected, but originally I thought maybe Baz Luhrmann was the one to handle this most recent adaptation properly. I was correct in just one respect…the depiction of the wild party scenes. Loud, garish, over-the-top…I thought they worked in the trailers, and I was impressed with them in the film proper. But the entirety of the movie is so overloaded with phony-looking CGI, that, after a while, you might as well be watching something like “Thor”. And it’s exhausting. Of course, it also fails miserably in capturing the soulfulness of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s beloved novella. Hey, it’s an uphill battle when you decide to mount a version of what some describe as the best American book of the twentieth century. And Luhrmann gets credit for the attempted climb. Hey, don’t forget that he breathed some youthful life into “William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet” in 1996, and “Moulin Rouge!” became a Best Picture contender in 2001. So, sometimes Baz’s overheated style works marvelously. But then, of course, there is the resounding thud of 2008’s “Australia” to remind you that the shtick has its limitations. Now, “The Great Gatsby” confirms it, too.

The people bought it though, so Luhrmann can effectively say “eff you” to all of us naysayers. “Gatsby” was easily his greatest financial success with almost 350 million dollars earned at the worldwide box office. And I did appreciate Leonardo DiCaprio, as he made a fine Gatsby(although if the script called for him to say “old sport” one more time I was going to break something).  Tobey Maguire isn’t a complete washout as Nick Carraway, but he’s still forgettable in the role. And Carey Mulligan, often one of our finest film actresses, seems miscast here. The fire required in the relationship between Gatsby and Daisy Miller is just not there. Joel Edgarton growls effectively as Tom, and Isla Fisher does make an impact as the tragic Myrtle Wilson. There is a period late in the film when Luhrmann calms all the pyrotechnics down, and you realize that he really did grasp the emotion of the novel and understands its hold atop classic literary fiction. He was simply the wrong director to bring a new interpretation to the screen. It’s BIG and it looks great(expect costume, make-up and production design nominations), but you’ll be beaten into submission until eventually pleading “make it stop!”. Multiple film adaptations of this story have occurred now and there’s still no clear winner. Next!     Grade:  C

Advertisements

4 comments on “The Great Gatsby

  1. We were so disappointed in this when we saw it on the big screen. Agree about all of it’s failings you listed above. We went back and watched Romeo and Juliet again to see if we were just wowed visually the first time around, but thankfully it did hold up. The gimmicks (big, loud, over the top beautiful and modern music) all work well there, but not so much for Gatsby. I thought Leo was awful too, a wooden caricature of a caricature. Not sure if it’s his fault or Baz’s.

    • Yeah, mostly agreed Sandy, except that I liked Leo. He unfairly gets labeled a pretty boy movie star, and I believe he’s quite underrated. Hopefully, the issues you had with him were the fault of Baz and the script. “Old sport, old sport, old sport”…I was going to scream. Unless I’m forgetting, Gatsby didn’t say it that much in the novel. ML

  2. I have read enough and more reviews of this film to actually make me want to watch the movie and figure out what the fuss is all about. Nice review though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: