What a disappointment. Especially after starting out so well. Denis Villeneuve’s “Prisoners” has some interesting things to say about human nature and Aaron Guzikowski’s script keeps us guessing throughout. Then they throw it all away to pure commercialism. If only actual cases ended with all the loopholes closed, like the finale of “Prisoners” chooses. Was it possible for it to be any neater. After asking some tough, moral questions for close to two hours, the film wraps up everything in such a tidy fashion that I was chuckling and shaking my head. JonBenet Ramsey, Etan Patz, Adam Walsh…I could list many more infamous abducted children cases, but you get the point, right? These situations usually end up horrible and tragic, with many unanswered questions…and often little closure. When you make a major motion picture about a mysterious kidnapping, you immediately run the risk of having the questions being asked much more fulfilling then the answers eventually provided. The antidote is to avoid supplying all the answers. That is the main sin of “Prisoners”—it divulges too much, and ultimately treats its audience like a bunch of dopes. 

Pennsylvania neighbors the Dovers and the Birches get together for Thanksgiving dinner at one of their suburban homes. Each family has a couple of kids, and at one point their young, kindergarten-age daughters Anna Dover and Joy Birch are out of sight, and presumed to be out front playing. As their parents search for the girls becomes increasingly frantic, the Dovers son Ralph(Dylan Minnette)remembers a battered RV that was parked on their block that the girls briefly climbed on. The RV is now gone. Police are alerted, and later that night the RV is located. When the authorities approach it, the driver attempts to flee—and crashes. They remove and arrest Alex Jones(a well-cast Paul Dano), who turns out to be mentally deficient with the I.Q. of a ten-year old. After he’s released, due to the lack of evidence against him, Anna’s father Keller Dover(a wildly, intense Hugh Jackman)decides to abduct and torture Alex. His feeling is they may only have limited time to save the girls, and he feels emboldened by something Alex said that points to his involvement in the crime. When Keller lets his friends Franklin and Nancy Birch(solid turns by Terrence Howard and Viola Davis)know what he’s attempting, they are horrified. But they don’t try to stop him either, and they keep from divulging Keller’s actions to his distraught wife, Grace(an effective Maria Bello). As the pensive, tattooed Detective Loki(a strong Jake Gyllenhaal)pursues the case, Joy Birch suddenly pops up mostly unharmed. And Keller begins to up the ante on his treatment of Alex in his quest to locate the still-missing Anna .

With the end credits included, “Prisoners” is a lengthy 153 minute film. It garnered some solid reviews and earned respectable box office this fall season. But the last half hour is full of crap. The movie works for a good portion as a thriller, but it begins hard only to end soft. It succeeds in getting you to invest in these characters and care about them, and then lets everyone you feel for “off the hook”, while punishing the guilty in a lethal manner. The film props itself up as an art piece, aided by the solid direction of Villenueve and gorgeous cinematography from the brilliant Roger Deakins. Then it becomes a pulpy cop-out incorporating an unrecognizable Melissa Leo into a ridiculous, red-herring sideswipe. Ultimately, “Prisoners” did not have the courage of its convictions. And I understand that it’s a commercial move, but it also rendered it into mediocrity. Too bad.     Grade:  C+ 


6 comments on “Prisoners

  1. Oh dear, think I’ll be giving this one a miss!

  2. Well, to be honest, the movie worked for me on various levels. Yes, while the ending was quite a dampener, I personally liked the fact that almost all loose ends were closed. My review is at http://moviebore.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/prisoners-movie-review/

    • ***Spoilers possible*** Thanks for your comment, but I’m not sure what you mean by the ending being a dampener. The ending to me was a gift with a big fat bow for the audience. Everyone who should get their comeuppance does, and everyone that you root for turns out okay. The neatness of the finale is absolutely ridiculous. Plus, you didn’t find the ending to contain any “crazy twists”? Well, I found the whole Melissa Leo character arc to be completely unrealistic. I would of preferred more ambiguity to being spoon fed. ML

  3. I think I agree with Mahabore. The ending was a dampener. An hour and a half of realiism leading to a typical Happily-Ever-After? I don’t buy it.

    • As a matter-of-fact, Twist, I wholeheartedly agree with YOU. So, unless I was misreading him, I didn’t feel that mahabore was seeing the finale quite that way. If he was, then I misinterpreted what mahabore was saying. But I don’t think so…I think he was totally cool with what you call Happily-Ever-After. Maybe he’ll qualify it for us…and thanks for commenting! ML

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: