The Assassin

Most critical opinion for Hou Hsiao-Hsien’s “The Assassin” was so strong, that I was extremely surprised that I didn’t adore it. Oh, there were some naysayers too, but the critics I read largely loved it. So much so, that I was reserving a place for it in my 2015 annual Top Ten. But, despite it being great looking (cinematography by Mark Lee Ping Bin), and very well acted and directed…it left me a little cold. I am so shocked by this development, that I fully expect to give “The Assassin” a future 2nd view. Connection could have been hampered by my torrid winter film pace. So, for now, it’s beautiful–but opaque.

“The Assassin” is set in the 8th century during the waning years of the Tang Dynasty. Nie Yinniang (a marvelous Shu Qi) has been raised by a martial arts master nun (Fang-yi Sheu) since a tender age. Soon, she’s trained as an assassin by her guardian Jiaxin, with the purpose of using her immense skills to eliminate corrupt government officials. An expert killer, Nie falters in her duties when she dares to show mercy. As punishment, Nie is sent by Jiaxin on a very difficult assignment to test her resolve. Ordered to the distant province of Weibo in Northern China, Yinniang is given the task of killing someone she loves.

Hou Hsiao-Hsien’s direction is so strong (he won Best Director at the 2015 Cannes Film Festival), and so patient, that there’s much to admire concerning the loving attention to his craft. In Mandarin (with English subtitles), the screenplay that he collaborated on, is rich and meticulous too. Also, limiting the use of audience-pleasing wuxia is a daring and admirable choice. I do admire the film. I just couldn’t quite penetrate it on my initial viewing. Still, I highly recommend a look, if only for my more astute cinephiles. Shu Qi has some wonderful presence, and Taiwanese actor Chang Chen also stars.

Grade:  B


4 comments on “The Assassin

  1. It was a very VERY laborious task trying to focus and keep myself awake during the film. I believe that art has its restraints,and over-doing it simply makes it less powerful. Cinematography may be nice, but it was so slow that I really couldn’t feel anything. Nice review 🙂

    • It is methodical, JW. I don’t necessarily agree with art having restraints, but this is certainly not for all tastes. However, the film critic I respect the most, ranks this very highly. So, another try is imminent, in case I missed something the first time.


      • Nono I don’t mean restraints as like rules. I mean it more like the artist has to know how to convey what he’s trying to convey without actually overdoing his artistic endeavours. Art should be free, but shouldn’t be uncontrolled. One e.g. is how I liked Under The Skin for the most part, but the director imo tried art for the sake of art, ruining some parts and particularly the end.

  2. I’m not a big believer in the “art for art’s sake” label, JW. Some GREAT directors have unfairly been accused of this. To me, these filmmakers simply have a different world view then the rest of us. For instance, “Under the Skin” is my favorite film of 2014, and Jonathan Glazer is consistently superb. What, for instance, could’ve improved the ending in your eyes?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: